In the wake of mass layoffs of photographers from major news organizations like the Chicago Sun Times and Sports Illustrated, the National Press Photographers Association
(NPPA) wanted to find out whether or not typical newspaper readers
preferred — or could even tell the difference between — photos shot by
professional photographers and those contributed by amateur shutterbugs.
The results, contained in the newly released scientific
Eyetracking Photojournalism Study and commissioned by the NPPA, were the
topic of a SXSW panel, “Who’s Driving the Extinction of Pro Photographers?” They should surprise no one.
Not only did viewers know what they liked, but they were
able to accurately identify which of the 200 photos and captions they
were asked to view were shot by pros, and expressed a distinct
preference for the professional over the user contributed images.
In examining a mainstream audience’s perceptions of
newspaper photos, eyetracking expert Sara Quinn found that 52 ordinary
readers — half men and half women ranging in age from 18 to 60 — were
quite conversant in most major aspects of photography. They were able to
point out factors like lighting, focus, camera angle, access to a scene
and storytelling skills.
This was no empirical touchy-feely opinion
study. Eyetracking is a precise science that determines what attracts
people to view certain elements on a page. A small, invisible infrared
camera placed under a computer screen tracks the position of the user’s
eye.
In addition, respondents were asked to rate the photos for
quality, say how likely they would be to share a photo, guess the
source of a photograph and give qualitative comments in an exit
interview.
The study found, among other things, that
the public is fluent in the quality of photojournalism and they trust
professional images more than user contributions. The study also found
users spent the most time looking at faces and people and reading photo
captions.
Furthermore, the conclusion states that the public is
distrustful of manipulated images, preferring real-life interactions to
posed photos and associates professional images with better quality.
TNW interviewed eyetracking expert Sara Quinn after the session to get her in-depth take on the findings. Have a listen below:
➤ NPPA
The photos in this story were among the 200 study participants were asked to rate. The top image is by Patrick Farrell.
0 comments for "Have advanced camera phones stunted our abilities to recognize professional photography?"
Post a Comment